Supporting local businesses is opportunistic as well

Supporting local businesses is opportunistic as well

Sarah Charles

January 7, 2026

locally sourced

“Buy local” or “woman-owned” is no longer just virtuous – it’s strategic

Airports, hotels, and corporates are using local brands to tick sustainability boxes

US supplier diversity rules now make sustainability a contract-winning advantage

IN public discourse, “supporting local” is cast as a moral act. It conjures images of farmers’ markets, family-run cafés and handmade bread purchased for the greater good. The implication is sacrifice: you pay a little more, convenience slips a little, but virtue is preserved.

In reality, supporting “local” is increasingly a strategy rather than a sentiment – and often a highly profitable one. A different motive takes nothing away from the impact and value of supporting local businesses or investing in other social and environmental benefits, but is still worth acknowledging.

Across hospitality, retail and corporate procurement, “local” has become a competitive asset. It reduces risk, satisfies regulatory checklists, polishes brand narratives and, as a result, can potentially unlock lucrative contracts. What looks like ethical consumption frequently doubles as operational optimisation.

According to the Energy Sustainability Directory, “local sourcing at its core is about shortening supply chains and leveraging regional resources for sustainability gains.” Supply & Demand Chain Executive found that “research shows that local sourcing can reduce transportation-related CO2 emissions by 30-50%,” providing faster delivery and lower environmental impact – turning shorter supply chains into both sustainability and efficiency wins.

Consider airports. Around the world, terminal operators are under pressure to demonstrate community engagement, sustainability credentials and economic contribution to their host cities. A 2024 Future Places Lab study noted that over 60% of Millennial and Gen Z travellers now associate airport quality with its F&B offering. And according to Airport World, “a strong F&B offer can help drive the overall perception of the airport. Today’s travellers have high standards and expect quality, sustainable dining options. They also want the airport to reflect the local area and culture.”

One of the easiest ways to do this is through food and beverage tenders. Instead of global chains, concession contracts increasingly require a proportion of local brands. It makes terminals look distinctive, meets municipal expectations and creates an instant story for travellers: taste the city before you leave it.

2020 news shows that even the world’s largest coffee chain is rethinking ubiquity: at the time, Starbucks planned to close around 400 stores in the U.S. and Canada, focusing on fewer but stronger locations amid rising costs, remote-work habits and intensifying competition from local cafés. At the same time, institutional procurement frameworks reshaped where global brands can operate. Most US airports are publicly run and embed “local participation” requirements into their food-and-beverage tenders, forcing concessionaires to prioritise local concepts over national chains.

In some cases, a single Starbucks unit can cost a concessionaire an entire terminal contract if it conflicts with a city’s local-first procurement rules – illustrating how “supporting local” has become not just a cultural preference, but a formal gatekeeper to high-value commercial real estate.

Airports create jobs and stimulate local economies. As they grow, they are incentivised to review their procurement policies to ensure they align with sustainable practices. Supporting local businesses that embrace sustainable practices can strengthen ties with the community and reduce the carbon footprint of imported goods. According to Data Intelo’s Airport Food and Beverage Market Outlook report, airport food and beverage markets are evolving rapidly: global airport F&B sales reached approximately $22.7bn in 2024 and are expected to grow strongly over the next decade as passengers demand premium and diverse dining options – including local offerings.

In this context, local cafés become winning tickets. A single airport unit can generate multiples of the revenue of a flagship high-street store, with footfall that independent brands could never otherwise access. Local identity becomes a passport to scale – no longer the opposite of expansion, it can become the entry ticket to it.

Hotels are adopting a similar logic, according to the Europe Hospitality Business Review. Local suppliers tend to deliver stronger reliability, quality oversight and a smaller environmental footprint, while international suppliers offer broader choice, lower costs and a hedge against regional disruptions.

Hotels are also diversifying supply chains by partnering with Indigenous businesses. Since 2015, Australia’s Indigenous Procurement Policy has generated more than $9.5bn in contract opportunities, with firms like KPMG sourcing 3.25% of procurement from Indigenous suppliers in FY2024, showing how formal targets and supplier partnerships can turn social goals into mainstream procurement practice.

Boutique hotels also now prioritise local roasters, bakeries and beverage suppliers – not simply for authenticity, but because it strengthens sustainability audits, reduces supply-chain volatility and differentiates their offering in crowded accommodation markets.

Ethics, in this context, is also efficiency.

Procurement as positioning

Corporate procurement has turned local into a formal category.

In parts of the United States, particularly in Texas and the Gulf states, companies – especially in energy, construction and infrastructure – are under pressure to demonstrate local economic participation.

In some US states, local procurement rules formally enshrine support for under-represented suppliers. For example, Texas’s Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) programme was designed to expand contracting opportunities for small, minority-, women- and veteran-owned businesses by requiring state agencies to make good-faith efforts to include them in purchasing and subcontracting opportunities. Certification under HUB grants increased visibility to public sector contracts and helps firms compete where diversity goals are embedded in procurement processes – turning ethical positioning into a strategic advantage for suppliers with the right credentials.

In the US, numerous federal, state, and /or local mandates that require businesses to incorporate diverse suppliers within their procurement strategies when dealing with public sector contracts. The Small Business Act is one of the federal mandates that promote supplier diversity. California’s Public Utilities Commission has established requirements for utilities to set goals for procuring from diverse suppliers, while New York’s Empire State Development Corporation requires that a minimum percentage of state contract spending must be allocated to minority- and women-owned businesses.

Coffee and catering are ideal vehicles for this. They are visible, recurring, low-risk and culturally symbolic. A multinational may not be able to localise its core operations – but it can localise what its employees eat and drink.

For independent cafés and roasters, this creates an unusually powerful route to scale. Landing a corporate contract can mean guaranteed volume, predictable cashflow and long-term stability. “Local” becomes a commercial moat.

Certification adds another layer. B Corp status, Fairtrade, organic, Rainforest Alliance, woman-owned or minority-owned badges increasingly operate as procurement shortcuts, because they convert complex ethical claims into scannable trust marks. That said, as greenwashing soars, some are questioning B Corp certification and the ethics and fairness of certification – and who it rewards – also remains a charged debate.

The result is a “professionalisation” of virtue. Sustainability becomes less about belief, and more about eligibility.

Even social impact itself is being operationalised. Brands that donate a fixed percentage of revenue to community projects, source shade-grown coffee or roast locally often find that these commitments function as procurement levers as much as moral ones.

Has “do good” has become a competitive advantage that has been codified, audited and monetised?

“It’s interesting, the goalposts seem to be shifting,” says Jamie Strachan, Head of Coffee at Caravan Coffee Roasters. “Fairtrade and Organic certifications are becoming less of a dealbreaker, and companies are more often willing to sit down and hear in long form how a company is making an impact.”

“For smaller independents trying to scale this can be very positive – being able to show transparency without paying the premium for the Fairtrade certificate, for example. But at the same time, the time spent compiling a presentation about your impact could be costly for a very small business. We’re currently compiling our report for B-Corp and setting new goals for the next year. It’s incredibly time-consuming but personally I find it motivational and exciting to deep dive on what’s possible for our business to achieve.”

eco-friendly bag

Aid, identity, and strategic altruism

Nowhere is the opportunistic dimension of “local” clearer than in developing markets themselves.

In East Africa, Latin America and parts of South-East Asia, producers are acutely aware of how sustainability narratives unlock export markets, NGO partnerships and concessional finance. Claims such as “woman-owned”, “youth-led”, “climate-smart” or “community cooperative” are not merely descriptive – they are strategic.

They speak directly to the priorities of development agencies, ethical buyers and grant frameworks.

This is not manipulation, but financial literacy. Producers understand the rules of the system they operate within and optimise accordingly. Sustainability, once informal, has become an economic language.

The same logic permeates wealthy markets. Independent businesses that position themselves as local, regenerative, carbon-light or community-owned are not just telling a story – they are placing themselves inside procurement systems that increasingly reward these attributes with access, visibility and volume.

Mason Cooper, from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, finds in his research that “supplier diversity initiatives in procurement have emerged as strategic imperatives for organisations aiming to enhance competitiveness and foster socio-economic equity,” highlighting that it is increasingly embedded in procurement strategy rather than treated as an optional add-on.

Claire Bosch Zuazo, a Director and Anthesis’ Global Lead for Social Impact, states that “today, in addition to regulatory requirements, supplier diversity is also a key expectation of stakeholders, such as consumers and investors. For example, a recent study of major buyers in Canada found that 82% of buyers expect their suppliers to meet at least one ESG criterion, with the number likely to continue to rise.”

The paradox is that the more formalised “local” or “sustainable” becomes, the less spontaneous it is. It shifts from an emotional choice to a structural one, changing the meaning of these terms. It becomes less about individual sacrifice and more about institutional advantage – but also perhaps more effectively implemented as a result.

The irony is that these moves are often cheaper, safer and easier than structural reform. Offsetting through procurement is simpler than changing core operations. Buying local is faster than decarbonising supply chains. Partnering with a B Corp is easier than becoming one.

“I think there’s a shift coming but the language isn’t quite there yet,” says Jamie. “I’d say that B-Corp is perhaps becoming the new ‘support local’ with that certification giving businesses peace of mind without having to read in detail about what a company is doing.”

“But in my experience tendering for an account, the procurement team wants details, anecdotes and data all together. I’m slightly cynical but I do believe we’re seeing a shift where the people working in these businesses have a genuine concern about sustainability.”

“Local” or “sustainable” can become a form of reputational arbitrage, with maximum goodwill and minimum disruption. Yet for the businesses on the receiving end, this arbitrage can be transformative. A single institutional contract can turn a fragile independent café into a multi-site operator. Supporting local or sustainable, in this sense, is not charity, but deal-making – and good business.

Coffee Intelligence